Re: [TLS] Posting of IPR disclosure (#1153)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TLS] Posting of IPR disclosure (#1153)
I don't see any difference between this disclosure and IPR 1004.
Same 19 RFCs
Same 11 drafts
Same linked document
Same contact information.
Is there an error here?
--Dean
On Wed, 27 May 2009 Pasi.Eronen at nokia.com wrote:
> FYI, this was posted yesterday:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1153/
>
> Best regards,
> Pasi
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
>
--
Av8 Internet Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net faster, more reliable, better service
617 344 9000
- Prev by Date:
Re: [TLS] Posting of IPR disclosure (#1153)
- Next by Date:
[TLS] Posting of IPR Disclosure related to Certicom's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4346, RFC 5246, RFC 5289, RFC 4492, RFC 2409, RFC 4306, RFC 4754, RFC 4753, RFC 4869, RFC 4253, RFC 2633, RFC 3278, RFC 4347, RFC 4366, RFC 4109, RFC 4252, RFC 3850, RFC 3851, RFC 5008, draft-ietf-tls-rfc43...
- Previous by thread:
Re: [TLS] Posting of IPR disclosure (#1153)
- Next by thread:
[TLS] Posting of IPR Disclosure related to Certicom's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4346, RFC 5246, RFC 5289, RFC 4492, RFC 2409, RFC 4306, RFC 4754, RFC 4753, RFC 4869, RFC 4253, RFC 2633, RFC 3278, RFC 4347, RFC 4366, RFC 4109, RFC 4252, RFC 3850, RFC 3851, RFC 5008, draft-ietf-tls-rfc43...
- Index(es):
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.