Re: [TLS] First TLS cached information draft posted
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TLS] First TLS cached information draft posted
Martin Rex <Martin.Rex at sap.com> writes:
> It might be sensible for the client to manage cache entries based
> on several attributes, and in particular distuigish also by the
> "server name" as used in the TLS extension "Server name indication"
> in order to support TLS-compatible virtual hosting.
That is a good point, and it would help implementers to make this
explicit. Stefan, how about adding a sentence to explain this? After
this paragraph
Clients MAY include an extension of type "cached_information" in the
(extended) client hello, which SHALL contain at least one
CachedObject as specified in section 2.
you could add
Clients MAY need the ability to cache different values depending on
other information in the Client Hello that modify what values the
server uses, in particular the Server Name Indication [RFC4366]
value.
If XML source is available, I could send you a patch. ;)
Thanks,
/Simon
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.