Re: [TLS] Cached Info extension - Draft 01

To: Stefan Santesson <stefan at aaa-sec.com>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Cached Info extension - Draft 01
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:11:17 +0000
Cc: Simon Josefsson <simon at josefsson.org>, tls at ietf.org
Delivered-to: tls at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <C670849E.2E64%stefan at aaa-sec.com> (Stefan Santesson's message of "Wed\, 01 Jul 2009 03\:12\:30 +0200")
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C670849E.2E64%stefan at aaa-sec.com>

* Stefan Santesson:

> One difficulty I have is that I don't see, and never have seen, the reason
> to provide different levels of hash algorithms for a usage that does not
> require a strong hash.

Why do you think this doesn't need a strong hash?

-- 
Florian Weimer                <fweimer at bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH       http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100              tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe             fax: +49-721-96201-99

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TLS] Cached Info extension - Draft 01
  - From: Stefan Santesson

References:
- Re: [TLS] Cached Info extension - Draft 01
  - From: Stefan Santesson

Prev by Date: Re: [TLS] Cached Info extension - Draft 01
Next by Date: Re: [TLS] Cached Info extension - Draft 01
Previous by thread: Re: [TLS] Cached Info extension - Draft 01
Next by thread: Re: [TLS] Cached Info extension - Draft 01
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [TLS] Cached Info extension - Draft 01

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.