Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis (Transport Layer

[Martin Rex <Martin.Rex at sap.com>]

Joseph Salowey wrote:
> 
> For option 2 I would prefer text that explains the SHOULD, maybe
> something like:
> 
> "Since it is possible for a client to present a different server_name in
> the application protocol, application server implementations that rely
> upon these names being the same MUST check to make sure the client did
> not present a different name in the application protocol." 

OK.  +1

-Martin