Re: [TLS] lasgt call comments (st Call: draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings (Channel Bindings for TLS) to Proposed Standard)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TLS] lasgt call comments (st Call: draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings (Channel Bindings for TLS) to Proposed Standard)

To: <Pasi.Eronen at nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [TLS] lasgt call comments (st Call: draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings (Channel Bindings for TLS) to Proposed Standard)
From: Simon Josefsson <simon at josefsson.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:18:44 +0100
Cc: channel-binding at ietf.org, sasl at ietf.org, tls at ietf.org
Delivered-to: tls at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <808FD6E27AD4884E94820BC333B2DB774E7F7C5641 at NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com> (Pasi Eronen's message of "Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:34:38 +0100")
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Openpgp: id=B565716F; url=http://josefsson.org/key.txt
References: <20091005162704.8C1B43A6873 at core3.amsl.com> <D3DC9D45B39CFC4CB312B2DD279B354C29BAE0E5 at TK5EX14MBXW653.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <87ocnrpq0f.fsf at mocca.josefsson.org> <87hbtjppfa.fsf at mocca.josefsson.org> <808FD6E27AD4884E94820BC333B2DB774E7F7C5641 at NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)

<Pasi.Eronen at nokia.com> writes:

> Can you check if the latest text proposals (Nico's email on 
> October 30th, starting "I spoke at length with Larry", and 
> my email earlier today) make the situation clearer?

I have the same question as Martin Rex: what is the actual semantic that
is wanted?  I thought I understood what was intended, but given this
discussion my understanding of what was intended may have been wrong.

/Simon

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TLS] [sasl] lasgt call comments (st Call: draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings (Channel Bindings for TLS) to Proposed Standard)
  - From: Nicolas Williams

References:
- [TLS] Last Call: draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings (Channel Bindings for TLS) to Proposed Standard
  - From: The IESG
- Re: [TLS] lasgt call comments (st Call: draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings (Channel Bindings for TLS) to Proposed Standard)
  - From: Larry Zhu
- Re: [TLS] lasgt call comments (st Call: draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings (Channel Bindings for TLS) to Proposed Standard)
  - From: Simon Josefsson
- Re: [TLS] lasgt call comments (st Call: draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings (Channel Bindings for TLS) to Proposed Standard)
  - From: Simon Josefsson
- Re: [TLS] lasgt call comments (st Call: draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings (Channel Bindings for TLS) to Proposed Standard)
  - From: Pasi.Eronen

Prev by Date: Re: [TLS] lasgt call comments (st Call: draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings (Channel Bindings for TLS) to Proposed Standard)
Next by Date: [TLS] MITM attack on delayed TLS-client auth through renegotiation
Previous by thread: Re: [TLS] lasgt call comments (st Call: draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings (Channel Bindings for TLS) to Proposed Standard)
Next by thread: Re: [TLS] [sasl] lasgt call comments (st Call: draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings (Channel Bindings for TLS) to Proposed Standard)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [TLS] lasgt call comments (st Call: draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings (Channel Bindings for TLS) to Proposed Standard)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.