Re: [TLS] TLS renegotiation issue
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TLS] TLS renegotiation issue
Michael D'Errico wrote:
>
> Martin Rex wrote:
> >
> > Eric's proposal to make renegotiation secure does not need any
> > API-level changes, everything is completely internal to the
> > TLS protocol engine.
>
> Having finished implementing the proposal, I can say that this is
> a true statement. No API changes were required.
Nico has drawn a raw sketch about SSPI (Microsoft schannel),
and that API will probably require a minor change.
I have not personal experiences with schannel, but from what
Nico described, I think a single new API function and slight
modification of the context iteration functions might
be sufficient (as discussed earlier postings).
CreateRenegoSecurityContext(prev_context, options, &new_context);
-Martin
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.