[TLS] Implementing https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/ekr/draft-rescorla-tls-renegotiate.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[TLS] Implementing https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/ekr/draft-rescorla-tls-renegotiate.txt

To: tls at ietf.org
Subject: [TLS] Implementing https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/ekr/draft-rescorla-tls-renegotiate.txt
From: Ben Laurie <benl at google.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 17:35:29 +0000
Delivered-to: tls at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1257701733; bh=yUQ3sk23iNQ2LejsAWwy+Mznmlg=; h=MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Content-Type; b=i5b4RUeEHP3ZOoTqGwn6OucAsILlpHpeuJO77EdoQgwFH9slqb9AHxKdAYcIwTTSX 5MCe+P2oIh0+iNfcj4qzw==
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-system-of-record; b=Mfys6qmERl0PAF7HUIystzjJnApBRXhYsjfmtxHPR5RX/XjPDUeDatdRcHG3xgtek yPqGDp33AnwZ2ZGvuDJRw==
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I have just committed an implementation of
https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/ekr/draft-rescorla-tls-renegotiate.txt
to the head of the 0.9.8-stable tree of OpenSSL.

At some point soon, I guess we'll be releasing an update. It'd be good
not to consume an experimental extension number in the process - how
do we get a real one allocated?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TLS] Implementing https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/ekr/draft-rescorla-tls-renegot iate.txt
  - From: Paul Hoffman

Prev by Date: Re: [TLS] [oss-security] CVE-2009-3555 for TLS renegotiation MITM attacks
Next by Date: Re: [TLS] TLS renegotiation issue
Previous by thread: Re: [TLS] To API or not (Re: TLS renegotiation issue)
Next by thread: Re: [TLS] Implementing https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/ekr/draft-rescorla-tls-renegot iate.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[TLS] Implementing https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/ekr/draft-rescorla-tls-renegotiate.txt

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.