Re: [TLS] draft-rescorla-tls-renegotiate and MITM resistance
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TLS] draft-rescorla-tls-renegotiate and MITM resistance



On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:37:46 +0100, David-Sarah Hopwood <david-sarah at jacaranda.org> wrote:

Martin Rex wrote:
There may be SSLv3 servers out there that choke on extension data
in the ClientHello.  But that doesn't mean that one could not
upgrade SSLv3 servers to support TLS extensions.  The more interesting
question is IMHO -- which TLS clients will choke when an SSLv3 server
returns a ServerHello extension?  spec-wise, a ServerHello extension
is as unusual to SSLv3 as it is to TLSv1.0.

Why would that situation arise? For that to happen, an SSL server
library would have to be upgraded to support extensions but not to
support TLS. Are there any SSL-only libraries being actively
maintained?

This is unlikely to work, because at least some clients (Opera being one) will never send Extensions to SSL v3 server. In fact, Opera will not attempt Extensions to a server until it knows it is dealing with a TLS 1.0+ server, because we know there are TLS 1.0 servers that does not accept Extensions (see http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-interoperability-00 ).



--
Sincerely,
Yngve N. Pettersen
 
********************************************************************
Senior Developer                     Email: yngve at opera.com
Opera Software ASA                   http://www.opera.com/
Phone:  +47 24 16 42 60              Fax:    +47 24 16 40 01
********************************************************************

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.