Re: [TLS] simplistic renego protection
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TLS] simplistic renego protection



Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> 
> Based on your respective most recent messages in this thread,
> I think you and Martin have different definitions of "lenient server".
> Please establish a common set of definitions.

I'm sorry -- my fault.

I was commenting your post (about the non-renego or renego-disabled
servers that are going to be with us for a while leaving clients
in the dark) but quoting the lenient stuff as well.

-Martin

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.