Re: [TLS] Consensus Call for draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-00.txt

[Robert Relyea <rrelyea at redhat.com>]

On 11/20/2009 01:53 PM, Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) wrote:
> We have had a lot of good discussion on this list, but I think we need
> to start converging on a solution. As I said in a previous message, I've
> asked Eric to serve as editor for the WG draft and he has posted
> draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-00 as a starting point.  I realize that
> there are a number of people who aren't happy with aspects of the draft,
> or indeed with the draft as a whole, but I'd like to get the sense for
> the feelings of the group as a whole. If we have rough consensus that
> this is a workable approach, we can try to nail down the remaining
> issues and move forward.
>
> To try to keep this concrete, please respond with answers to this
> question:
>
> Support for the draft:
> - I support this draft
> - I support this draft with the following modification
> - I would support an entirely different proposal (please identify it; be
> specific) 
>   
I support this draft.

bob

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature