Re: [TLS] Consensus Call for draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-00.txt

["Robert Dugal" <rdugal at certicom.com>]

I support this draft

--
Robert Dugal		Senior Software Developer
Certicom Corp.		A Subsidiary of Research In Motion
rdugal at certicom.com
direct        905.501.3848
fax             905.507.4230
www.certicom.com

-----Original Message-----
From: tls-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:tls-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 4:53 PM
To: tls at ietf.org
Subject: [TLS] Consensus Call for draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-00.txt

We have had a lot of good discussion on this list, but I think we need
to start converging on a solution. As I said in a previous message, I've
asked Eric to serve as editor for the WG draft and he has posted
draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-00 as a starting point.  I realize that
there are a number of people who aren't happy with aspects of the draft,
or indeed with the draft as a whole, but I'd like to get the sense for
the feelings of the group as a whole. If we have rough consensus that
this is a workable approach, we can try to nail down the remaining
issues and move forward.

To try to keep this concrete, please respond with answers to this
question:

Support for the draft:
- I support this draft
- I support this draft with the following modification
- I would support an entirely different proposal (please identify it; be
specific)

If you are proposing a modification, in addition to providing a
description and rationale for a modification to the document it is
helpful to provide sample text of the modification. Also, please
indicate whether you would only support the draft with your modification
or whether you can live with it unmodified.

Thanks,

Joe
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.