Re: [TLS] Consensus Call for draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-00.txt

To: tls at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Consensus Call for draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-00.txt
From: David-Sarah Hopwood <david-sarah at jacaranda.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:32:48 +0000
Delivered-to: tls at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=XE6potbrYfT7Y9ou3WU4NhFbR3WlKO+kt17O8i1Dwhw=; b=Y3tR9debLpnkTJXz+lC/ErfkVWw+zGD81P7sl7ApEMvtfn6C2wFh0rDVAdicLUVuBH G4c9J2VwLx7KbGGUUEPTxPSdnG16cadj0eLm39W03DwTDd+HxKGZHyVPAxWgqWMuE22K TLDCPpeT02c8Sq0Vdt9tx4Sn0jzTjpLZOqGb0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; b=ejJZQZSZkIcGic3pfRwhiGVNx+Zv9ZxK3UrCQ9TvQ9ZD1BXn5Liq4uVbgeQHi7w0hD kENJoncIICKpS5sI8DRGpCxxH2SooxZYufw2CHunXpVzULRJhrQik3CN4jqHjxuPnChe 1aFOTAGdplNmeVv/KbWdNKtcaCBhwjFcwx/hs=
In-reply-to: <B197003731D4874CA41DE7B446BBA3E829CD79C2 at TK5EX14MBXW653.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AC1CFD94F59A264488DC2BEC3E890DE5092192D6 at xmb-sjc-225.amer.cisco.com> <B197003731D4874CA41DE7B446BBA3E829CD79C2 at TK5EX14MBXW653.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Sender: David-Sarah Hopwood <djhopwood at googlemail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070326 Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

Nasko Oskov wrote:
> I support the TLS extension approach for TLS1.0 and above with the
> modification that we add the magic cipher suite in the client hello.
> This will allow a TLS ClientHello with the extension to be used
> against SSLv3 only server (assuming server properly ignores extensions).

The RI approach can be used with an extension-tolerant SSLv3-only server
even without the "magic ciphersuite".

-- 
David-Sarah Hopwood  ⚥  http://davidsarah.livejournal.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TLS] Consensus Call for draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-00.txt
  - From: Martin Rex

References:
- [TLS] Consensus Call for draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-00.txt
  - From: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: [TLS] Consensus Call for draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-00.txt
  - From: Nasko Oskov

Prev by Date: Re: [TLS] RC4+3DES rekeying - long-lived TLS connections
Next by Date: Re: [TLS] Consensus Call for draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-00.txt
Previous by thread: Re: [TLS] Consensus Call for draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-00.txt
Next by thread: Re: [TLS] Consensus Call for draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [TLS] Consensus Call for draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-00.txt

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.