[Tools-discuss] Re: rfcmarkup changes

[Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>]

Julian Reschke wrote:

> why would you want to parse the output of the RFCmarkup
> script in the first place? I'd really like to understand
> the use case?

I'm not planning to do something with it.  Stuff somebody
else might wish to try is to evaluate links and anchors in
some way.  The output is of course simple enough to get it
right also for a hypothetical HTML version.

Probably Henrik uses some general procedures to create the
XHTML, and there might be more interesting output cases than
rfcmarkup, where XHTML instead of HTML is a serious advantage.

Now I dare test JavaScript 1.1 enabled:  Only two errors, no
visual effect, no browser crash, good.

1035 has an IEN-116 reference, and I vaguely recall that this
is available at the RfC editor...  yes, here:

ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/ien/ien116.txt

The rfcmarkup link creator could resolve these IEN references.

Bye, Frank



_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss