Re: [Tools-discuss] ABNF draft to Internet Standard?

[Tony Hansen <tony at att.com>]

It would be a good idea for 4234 to go to Full Standard.

Are these two statements at odds?

  *  "the ABNF RFC ... can go to Full Standard without any changes"
  *  "the text of the current RFC would be upgraded"

But that can be done by a change in the RFC *index*, and shouldn't
require any change in the text of the RFC itself. The RFC doesn't need
to be reissued or anything; just update the meta data. There's a reason
that the meta data is separate.

	Tony Hansen
	tony at att.com

Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> It's been suggested to me that the ABNF RFC, now at Draft Standard, can
> go to Full Standard without any changes.  Thus the text of the current
> RFC <http://rfc.net/rfc4234.html> would be upgraded.


_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss