Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: [ABNF] Legal or not legal to have literal numbers?

["Bill Fenner" <fenner at gmail.com>]

On 11/10/06, Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de> wrote:
> Another question is if a legal ( 0DIGIT ) could be also
> written as ( 0 DIGIT ).  In RFC 3986 they have 0<pchar>
> for an empty path.  Bill's parser says "error", it does
> not like a 0 in an nRule (4234 3.7).
> ... maybe Bill could reduce the error to a warning.

The only message I can manage to come up with is

1:6: fyi: absolute repeat count of zero means this element may not occur at all

The "fyi" is intended to indicate that it's not an error, or even a warning.

Perhaps the CGI script's output is the problem, since it says "Errors
during parsing:" when it is really "Output during parsing".

 Bill

_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss