Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: Enhancements to HTMLized versions of RFCs and drafts

[Henrik Levkowetz <henrik at levkowetz.com>]

Hi Frank,

on 2006-11-19 22:42 Frank Ellermann said the following:
> Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
>  
>> I've added some new features to the HTMLized versions of RFCs and drafts
> 
> Great.
> 
>> I've added an indication of the standards level of an RFC at the top of
>> the HTMLized version; it will now say "DRAFT STANDARD", "PROPOSED 
>> STANDARD" or "STANDARD" according to what's indicated in the latest 
>> rfc-index from rfc-editor.org.
> 
> Test, RFC 821 (STD 10) doesn't say STANDARD.  For 1123 (STD 3) it works.

Ah. For most of the information (updated, obsoleted, draft source, etc.)
I had generated the information both for the 0XXX and XXX versions, but
for the status information I'd missed that, so all standard track RFCs
below 1000 were broken.  Fixed now.

>> I've added a link to a Google search for drafts containing the exact
>> title, so that it is  easier to find the referenced draft.
> 
> That doesn't work, you have spaces in the URLs, you need %20.  Example:
> 
> .../search?sitesearch=tools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2F&q=inurl:draft-+"COPS Over CMS"

Ah.  Works in my browser, but then the browser is being nice to me,
I guess.

> Probably you want the following, not limited to tools.ietf.org/html/,
> and using the "IETF search" feature as on the main www.IETF.org page:
> 
> http://www.google.com/u/ietf?q=inurl:draft-+"COPS%20Over%20CMS";
> 
> If you're sure that you want to limit it to tools.ietf.org/html/ it's...
> 
> http://www.google.com/u/ietf?q=inurl:tools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-+"COPS%20Over%20CMS

Right.  I believe that for space in particular I can also use '+'. If
so, it's now fixed.

> ...but that doesn't find anything at the moment, probably there's no
> such draft, or googlebot has not yet found it.

Right.  Yes, for this purpose I want to limit it to tools.ietf.org/html,
as that should work particularly well once the titles are being picked
up.  Of course, it's still the case that not all old drafts are in the
repository.

> The .../u/ietf?q=... part returns search results without Ads, compare
> https://services.google.com/pss_faq.html#11
> 
> The folks who customized the IETF search "look and feel" forgot to add
> the IETF logo.  That's sad if it's the same idea as for the old free
> site search, because it might offer a back link to www.ietf.org, like
> my "logo" on http://purl.net/xyzzy/-AWFID/99%2520inches%2520in%2520rods

Right.

I may set up a tools.ietf.org specific PSS search in the future, and
then I'll keep this in mind for the configuration.


Thanks,

	Henrik

_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss