Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: ietf-ftpext-mlst
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: ietf-ftpext-mlst



Hi Frank

on 2006-12-02 21:40 Frank Ellermann said the following:
> Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
>>> Nice, thanks, I always love shorter URLs :-)
>  
>> Just make sure that there is *one* preferred URI for RFCs
>> and IDs (in HTML), and make sure those do not break :-)
> 
> ACK, I won't use the "omit draft-" or "omit rfc" tricks in
> any public URLs.  Has <link rel="bookmark" href="pref-URI" />
> an effect with modern browsers ?  

I believe so, although I haven't used it.

> The "show last I-D" feature could use this, the location is
> the complete URL .../html/draft-xxx-nn.txt, the bookmark is
> .../html/draft-xxx, unless the query was explicitly for -nn.

Yes.  Except that means I'd have to re-write cached pages to
insert or change the <link/> element depending on what the
original request was for.  I'd prefer not to do this (at least
at this time) - the request counts for /html/ pages have been
rising steadily over the last 8 weeks or so, and if I hadn't
changed to caching I would probably have been in occasional
trouble for one of the servers now (not enough processing power).

For plain page fetches the load isn't troublesome.  It's now a
bit more than 4000 pages average non-Googlebot requests per day
per server, and a bit more than that from the Googlebots.  But
the number was about half of that about 2 months ago.  I expect
it to continue climbing.  Peak numbers are ~20000 /html/ requests
per server per day.


	Henrik


_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.