Re: [Tools-discuss] Some oddities on IAB/IESG "WG pages"
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tools-discuss] Some oddities on IAB/IESG "WG pages"



Hi Pekka,

On 2008-03-05 16:23 Pekka Savola said the following:
Hi,

Some observations on IAB/IESG "WG pages":

http://www3.tools.ietf.org/group/iab/ lists only 'draft-iab-dns-choices' under Active drafts, while draft-iab-ip-config and draft-iab-protocol-success are listed as Related drafts. I'd expect all of them to be listed as active drafts.

So would I.  However, the ietf database lists only the dns-choices
draft as belonging to the iab.  I don't know whether this should be
fixed by maintaining the database better, or by me using some
iab-specific heuristics rather than what's specified in the database
for these...

Also, at least draft-iab-iwout-report is listed as Expired, even though those should be RFC published (RFC4948 in this case).

Right.  Again, I'll point to the datatracker database being out of
date.  In this case, I do have alternative datasources to use; I'll
do a re-write to use the more direct source for this (i.e., publication
status).

On http://www3.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/, it's not obvious why 'draft-zinin-early-review' is listed as an IESG document.

Well, right.  But guess what I'm going to say here ,;-) ...

That what the ietf database has it classified as ,,:-}


Suggestions for action/improvement?


	Henrik

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.