Re: [Tools-discuss] [Fwd: getdrafts not working for IETF 71?]

[Glen <glen at amsl.com>]

Done!

Glen

Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
> Hi Glen,
> 
> I'm forwarding an observation made on the tools-discuss at ietf.org list.
> 
> It would be good if we by default could have Option MultiViews on in
> the Apache config -- not only would it fix the problem below, but
> knowing that this was set, we could start transitioning to URLs without
> specified extensions, which would permit more flexibility in changing
> between dynamically created pages and static pages in the future.
> 
> 
> Best,
> 
>     Henrik
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [Tools-discuss] getdrafts not working for IETF 71?
> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:50:26 +0100
> From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr>
> Organisation: NIC France
> To: ekr at networkresonance.com
> CC: tools-discuss at ietf.org
> 
> getdrafts 1.02 does not download any draft for the next meeting:
> 
> %  getdrafts -V 08mar behave ippm
> WG: behave
>  URL=http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/08mar/agenda/behave
> Couldn't get agenda for behave
> WG: ippm
>  URL=http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/08mar/agenda/ippm
> Couldn't get agenda for ippm
> NOT FOUND: WG: behave
> NOT FOUND: WG: ippm
> Found 0 out of 0 drafts
> 
> 
> It seems that getdrafts relied on HTTP content negotiation (behave
> agenda is behave.html and ippm agenda is ippm.txt) which does not (no
> longer?) work on the IETF Web site.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
> 
_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss