Re: [Tools-discuss] bof jabber rooms

[Henrik Levkowetz <henrik at levkowetz.com>]

Ouch.  Ouch.  Name collision.  I don't even want to work around this,
I want to discover how to prevent it from happening again.  Gumph.

I'll try to look into that.


	Henrik



On 2008-03-12 10:44 Aaron Falk said the following:
> On Mar 12, 2008, at 9:29 AM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
> 
>> Hi Aaron,
>>
>> On 2008-03-12 09:01 Aaron Falk said the following:
>>> Is it deliberate that the agenda at http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/ 
>>> 71  doesn't have links to BoF jabber rooms?  C.f. IDN BoF.
>> No, that's a bug :-)
>>
>> I'll see what I can do.  I think the mechanism I used to tease out
>> the jabber room information for BOFs have broken with the transition
>> to the new secretariat.  There was never a well-defined procedure for
>> the setup and naming of those...
>>
>>
>> 	Henrik
> 
> Ah, well the plot thickens in the case of IDN which is both the name  
> of a bof and a working group.  The agenda page shows the BoF agenda  
> but labels it a 'Concluded WG' and points to the closed wg's charter.   
> Dunno how you handle this ambiguity....
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/idn/agenda?item=agenda71.html
> 
> --aaron
> 
_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss