Re: [Tools-discuss] meta-issues on charter discussions
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tools-discuss] meta-issues on charter discussions
The tools WG pages used to have diffs between charter versions
(see e.g. http://tools.ietf.org/wg/tls/charters/ -- the "delta"
symbol leads to side-by-side diff between the versions), but
it looks like this broke when new www.ietf.org was deployed
in July....
Best regards,
Pasi
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> ext Tony Hansen
> Sent: 21 August, 2009 17:57
> To: tools-discuss at ietf.org
> Cc: ietf at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: meta-issues on charter discussions
>
> This was posted to the ietf list.
>
> While the charter history pages are nice, they can be made better using
> a format similar to how tools.ietf.org presents RFCs and I-Ds: a
> non-printing list of versions at the top with ways to show differences
> between versions.
>
> Sounds like a job for the tools team. :-)
>
> Tony Hansen
> tony at att.com
>
> Thomas Narten wrote:
> > Re: old charters and such.
> >
> > While poking around earlier this week, I found:
> >
> > http://www.ietf.org/dyn/wg/charter/history/
> >
> > (it is hanging of the WG pages, so not that hard to find.)
> >
> > It appears to be a snapshot of charters whenever they change. But,
> > they "change" often due to events that are probably not the kind of
> > changes we are thinking about, and there is no indication about what
> > has changed, so there are a lot of copies and wading through them to
> > find stuff appears pretty daunting. And the history only goes back 3
> > years or so...
> >
> > But they might be a basis for some tools to extract stuff. But, if
> > tools are going to do this, it seems like an archival format other
> > than HTML would be desirable.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.