Re: [Tools-discuss] BCP 47 not updated?

To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] BCP 47 not updated?
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:59:38 +1300
Cc: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>, Mark Davis <mark at macchiato.com>, "Phillips, Addison" <addison at amazon.com>, tools-discuss at ietf.org, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>
Delivered-to: tools-discuss at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UIdQomu+1zBQHB2uVZVQWH44lP1Nu6xq17Rhb433J4A=; b=nZb5OmkaDivkgjvHthoFGD7pmacNZh46BIWL91Qb3rL+eIpWGQU4NwImYkVLrWH0jJ lOPY/ONltkTmHRg5dlBLIUAf3OG1bphHhYGZmRuQaVdJOqnKgN9WBcb1beYI2mUomJ9v ORhbgRyhvLhorNYI7tr1QPpRKYsW02l8W62SU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=oroDsdojRhOXi40XerVRqus4zdQqX1WG5jhXM6pq/7a/SZQv1UaaybJa/ewToX23nM 14Y9V3n1NCwdci04U8PatrSGsaINbO6QLid1AtMZONzRZEvANd54jTXbOxpqEhUYhfeu tAE//teN5+8B0HsjUs8WHa4maYlw2+W3TKe4U=
In-reply-to: <4AEAB112.8050005 at it.aoyama.ac.jp>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: University of Auckland
References: <4AEAB112.8050005 at it.aoyama.ac.jp>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)

On my screen today it contains 4647 followed by 5646, which is
correct and matches the RFC Editor site
(http://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp47.txt)

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 2009-10-30 22:25, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp47 contains RFC 4646, when it should be
> RFC 5646 (see http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5646). I know it's a very
> special case (one BCP consisting of two RFCs), but it would still be
> very nice if it were updated.
> 
> Thanks and regards,    Martin. (LTRU co-chair)

References:
- [Tools-discuss] BCP 47 not updated?
  - From: "Martin J. Dürst"

Prev by Date: [Tools-discuss] BCP 47 not updated?
Next by Date: Re: [Tools-discuss] BCP 47 not updated?
Previous by thread: [Tools-discuss] BCP 47 not updated?
Next by thread: Re: [Tools-discuss] BCP 47 not updated?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [Tools-discuss] BCP 47 not updated?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.