Re: [Tools-discuss] BCP 47 not updated?

[Mark Davis ☕ <mark at macchiato.com>]

Thanks; glad to hear there is a reason behind it.

Mark

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 17:15, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Mark,

I assume you mean requests to the RFC Editor, since that's
where the concatentation originates. I assume that their procedure
just concatenates the files in numerical order.

I suspect that this will have to wait now until the RFC publication
service has been migrated over to the new contractor, in a few
months. I doubt that ISI will be touching their procedures again.

Regards
  Brian Carpenter

On 2009-10-31 11:32, Mark Davis ☕ wrote:
> For me, both http://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp47.txt and
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp47 show the same contents, and both correctly
> include 5646 and 4647.
>
> However, and they both *still* show the RFCs in the wrong order: 5646 is far
> and away the most important one, and is necessary for understanding 4647,
> but 4647 comes first in BCP 47. Despite requests, that still hasn't changed.
>
> Mark
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 15:07, Brian E Carpenter <
> brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It's updated on the tools server at
>> http://[2001:1890:1112:1:214:22ff:fe1f:1e54]/html/bcp47
>>
>> Maybe you are seeing a cached copy?
>>
>> I also see it updated on 208.66.40.242 and 64.170.98.42
>>
>> The third A record is 194.146.105.14, and that one 404's
>> on http://194.146.105.14/html/bcp47, looks like a faulty redirect.
>>
>> Regards
>>    Brian Carpenter
>>
>> On 2009-10-31 08:12, Phillips, Addison wrote:
>>> The RFC Editor has it correctly, but the tools page (the link Martin
>> sent, which is the text marked up with HTML links and such, at
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp47 ) is not updated.
>>> Addison
>>>
>>> Addison Phillips
>>> Globalization Architect -- Lab126
>>>
>>> Internationalization is not a feature.
>>> It is an architecture.
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 12:00 PM
>>>> To: "Martin J. Dürst"
>>>> Cc: tools-discuss at ietf.org; Randy Presuhn; Mark Davis; Phillips,
>>>> Addison; Alexey Melnikov
>>>> Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] BCP 47 not updated?
>>>>
>>>> On my screen today it contains 4647 followed by 5646, which is
>>>> correct and matches the RFC Editor site
>>>> (http://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp47.txt)
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>    Brian Carpenter
>>>>
>>>> On 2009-10-30 22:25, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
>>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp47 contains RFC 4646, when it
>>>> should be
>>>>> RFC 5646 (see http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5646). I know it's a
>>>> very
>>>>> special case (one BCP consisting of two RFCs), but it would still
>>>> be
>>>>> very nice if it were updated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks and regards,    Martin. (LTRU co-chair)
>>
>