|
David, I see some definite negatives to what you are suggesting:
Eliot On 10/12/09 7:01 PM, David Booth wrote: I don't see a need to define a new URI scheme for this. You can just define an http URI prefix for this purpose, as described in http://dbooth.org/2006/urn2http/ Furthermore, as Graham Klyne suggested during a similar discussion earlier, "an HTTP URI can also retrieve a protocol [handler] implementation" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2009Sep/0029.html This could dramatically improve the adoption rate of a new protocol. David Booth On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 11:01 -0500, Steve Suehring wrote:Hello, Attached is a draft to be submitted to the IETF for URI scheme related to secure shell (ssh). The draft was originally included in the secsh Working Group which has since concluded. http://tools.ietf.org/wg/secsh/draft-ietf-secsh-scp-sftp-ssh-uri/ I recently received a request to pick this draft back up and the co-author and I will be submitting it to the IETF under the Application Area. Please provide feedback as appropriate. Thank you for your time. Steve Suehring _______________________________________________ Uri-review mailing list Uri-review at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review |