[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI

To: uri-review at ietf.org, uri at w3.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI
From: "Daniel R. Tobias" <dan at tobias.name>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:51:51 -0400
Delivered-to: uri-review at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <5EAB4D387A4A4B7C854FBD1869729771 at POCZTOWIEC>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Barely
Priority: normal
References: <20091009160149.GB16908 at braingia.org>, <1255366894.5481.8445.camel at dbooth-laptop>, <5EAB4D387A4A4B7C854FBD1869729771 at POCZTOWIEC>

On 12 Oct 2009 at 21:35, Kristof Zelechovski wrote:

> David, you do not see a need to define a new URI scheme for anything, do
> you?.  If I you do, please enumerate the requirements for a protocol that
> would save it from the http black hole.

It does seem to be an ideological position for some.


-- 
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/
Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI
  - From: David Booth

References:
- [Uri-review] ssh URI
  - From: Steve Suehring
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI
  - From: David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI
  - From: Kristof Zelechovski

Prev by Date: Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI
Next by Date: Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI
Previous by thread: Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI
Next by thread: Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread