John,
Why wouldn't an HTTP URI prefix be just as good or better for this
purpose? The use of HTTP URI prefixes is described here:
http://dbooth.org/2006/urn2http/
Note that HTTP URIs could dramatically improve the adoption rate for a
new protocol, by resolving to a download of the protocol implementation
software, as suggested by Graham Klyne:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2009Sep/0029.html
David Booth
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 15:42 +0100, John Larmouth wrote:
Alfred, Chris,
Many thanks for all your help.
You will see that I have now posted draft-larmouth-oid-iri-02 which
contains all the corrections you suggested, and there have been no
further comments on uri-review in the last couple of weeks..
It is now my intention to e-mail iana at iana.org (in accordance with RFC
4395) to request IANA to register 'oid:' as a permanent URI scheme,
referencing draft-larmouth-oid-iri-02 (IANA considerations) for the
registration template.
If anyone on this list has problems with that, please respond in the
next week.
I guess that the Designated Expert for the IANA requested Expert Review
is likely to be Alfred (who has been most active in reviewing earlier
drafts), and will hopefully have no problems in rapidly responding to
that request from IANA.
I hope we can soon bring this to a conclusion.
Thank you.
John L
_______________________________________________
Uri-review mailing list
Uri-review at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review