Re: [Uri-review] Review request for about: URI scheme draft
Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org> Tue, 14 September 2010 16:41 UTC
Return-Path: <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523DF3A683A for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3yZImR8niw7k for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay8.mail.ox.ac.uk (relay8.mail.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.171]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D69E3A6AF0 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.mail.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.207]) by relay8.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>) id 1OvYZC-0005v1-Sy; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:41:10 +0100
Received: from gklyne.plus.com ([80.229.154.156] helo=Eskarina.local) by smtp1.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>) id 1OvYZC-0000QE-5I; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:41:10 +0100
Message-ID: <4C8F9DB5.3@ninebynine.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:07:17 +0100
From: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
References: <4C8F7538.8090309@lachy.id.au>
In-Reply-To: <4C8F7538.8090309@lachy.id.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Oxford-Username: zool0635
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Review request for about: URI scheme draft
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:41:54 -0000
I'm not seeing any significant problems with this. As far as I can tell, it pretty much documents existing practice. If this proposal is accepted for standards-track publication, I'd suggest changing the "provisional" status in the registration template to "permanent". #g -- Lachlan Hunt wrote: > Hi, > I'm about to request publication of the about: URI scheme draft to > complete the registration. So I'm requesting one final review of the > most recent draft. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-04 >
- [Uri-review] Review request for about: URI scheme… Lachlan Hunt
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request for about: URI sc… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request for about: URI sc… Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request for about: URI sc… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request for about: URI sc… Julian Reschke