Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review

Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> Tue, 25 October 2011 05:22 UTC

Return-Path: <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FFD21F8C56 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.778
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.778 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.321, BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A2SIs+fioS-B for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E696E21F8C55 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwe6 with SMTP id 6so107280wwe.13 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=xlvR0v3PAKmsy2tyCf5obFVobaBJ+n+a7dY0ibBVjOg=; b=Y5lODANKJw6xgeAG3/gvsMAt0+R+RcncoEeDMVKC+9xNqukReYg4agalB4LvTlDJne +p5k6xjzv7WtO6vN25mKj5dU79drOpFnfB6Aer5QwsqHHiFY/52gU8BJlw+H6c65kYFM 50HlB3ha2mfc0ZFUQI/RCcK67HVt+qVRgbTXQ=
Received: by 10.227.60.131 with SMTP id p3mr1455897wbh.4.1319520123086; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.80.134 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHcUcOF=z7v5cTN7gsvfX45QLw2jGNSdiQYgybUB6Aq=BjjkZw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHcUcOGgv8deMk3yw0FH8HrHee5Hi0pXcFCRwYDfaO_ta_nuGA@mail.gmail.com> <4EA24B23.3010900@gmail.com> <4EA33D70.6080500@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4EA4EDFB.3050406@gmail.com> <CAHcUcOF=z7v5cTN7gsvfX45QLw2jGNSdiQYgybUB6Aq=BjjkZw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:21:23 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHhFybpk=2uXXia-LDEGz=S_xtE7bawEhHHsB8FZ8eVWbHksUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bob Van Zant <bob@eventbrite.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 05:22:04 -0000

On 24 October 2011 07:32, Bob Van Zant wrote:

> In any case I submitted our registration request to
> IANA before this occurred.

Maybe 4395bis should pick two instead of four weeks
for reviews.  It works on another list with the same
expert.  IANA or expert can always bounce a request
if they feel that it needs more tuning, but generally
your intuitive approach (silence => submit) should be
good enough.

-Frank