[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Application for a formal NID

To: internet-drafts at ietf.org, urn-nid at apps.ietf.org
Subject: RE: Application for a formal NID
From: Goodwin <goodwin at iso.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 12:15:03 +0100
Cc:
In-reply-to:
List-help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.apps.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:urn-nid@apps.ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: ISO
Reply-to: goodwin at iso.org
Thread-index: AcYs+DgEgxLPYRwjROu3JTLFzssEIQAhPzzgBRa9bDA=
Could I please enquire as to the status of this submission.

With best wishes 

Jo Goodwin

-----Original Message-----
From: Goodwin [mailto:goodwin at iso.org] 
Sent: 2006-02-09 14:34
To: 'internet-drafts at ietf.org'
Subject: RE: Application for a formal NID

As far as I understand your rules, I have altered the file name accordingly.
Please find the renamed file attached.

With best regards

Jo Goodwin

-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts at ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts at ietf.org]
Sent: 2006-02-08 22:40
To: goodwin at iso.org
Subject: RE: Application for a formal NID

Please make sure that the draft-rfc-urn-iso-12 file name is correct. And
then resubmit.

Thank you.


> Dear Secretariat
>
> I have carried out all the modifications listed and have updated the 
> date and version number of the draft.
>
> Please find the revised file attached. If I need to do anything more 
> in order for this draft to be accepted I'd be grateful if you would 
> let me know.
>
> Thanks again for your help.
>
> Best regards
>
> Jo Goodwin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-drafts at ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts at ietf.org]
> Sent: 2006-02-02 20:05
> To: goodwin at iso.org
> Subject: RE: Application for a formal NID
>
> The Secretariat CANNOT process your Internet-Draft submission due to 
> following reason(s):
>
>  * All Internet-Drafts must have on the first page an intellectual 
> property rights (IPR) statement that says:
>
> By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any 
> applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware have 
> been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes aware 
> will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
>
> If you are using xml2rfc, this can be accomplished by updating the 'ipr'
> attribute in the 'rfc' element to refer to 3978. See 
> http://xml.resource.org/authoring/draft-mrose-writing-rfcs.html#ipr
> for more information.
>
>  * All Internet-Drafts must include the following statement:
>
> Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
>
>
>  * All Internet-Drafts must include the following statement:
>
> This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions 
> contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors 
> retain all their rights.
>
>
>  * All Internet-Drafts must include the following statement:
>
> This document and the information contained herein are provided on an 
> "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS 
> OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET 
> ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, 
> INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE 
> INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED 
> WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
>
>
>  * All Internet-Drafts must contain the full filename (beginning with
> draft-
> and including the version number) in the text of the document.
>
>
>  * All Internet-Drafts must include the following statements:
>
> Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task 
> Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other 
> groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
> Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months 
> and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any 
> time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material 
> or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
>
> The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at 
> http://www.ietf.org/1id-abstracts.html
>
> The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at 
> http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
>
>
>  * All Internet-Drafts must have an Abstract section.
>
>  * All Internet-Drafts should contain a section giving the name(s) and 
> contact information for the authors.
>
>
>
>
>> Apologies for the silence - I have been sick for the last few days.
>>
>> Please find attached the document as a txt as requested.
>>
>> Thanks again for your help. Best regards
>>
>> Jo Goodwin
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: internet-drafts at ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts at ietf.org]
>> Sent: 2006-01-27 20:20
>> To: goodwin at iso.org
>> Subject: RE: Application for a formal NID
>>
>> You should send it in a plan TXT file. Please resubmit.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hello Dinara
>>>
>>> Thanks very much for the offer -- I really appreciate it. For your 
>>> information, I did check the draft (even before I sent it the last
>>> time) against the I-D checklist that Leslie Daigle kindly pointed me 
>>> towards and thought that the draft complied in all respects except 
>>> that the Contents was not ragged right (but it was that way in the 
>>> example file that I had been given so decided that it was probably 
>>> ok), and I wasn't sure that the draft complied with the rule "It 
>>> must not contain boilerplate that prohibits publication as an RFC"
>>> (but since I didn't/don't know what such boilerplate might be I 
>>> cannot judge whether it does or does not comply with this rule).
>>>
>>> I have also looked at the Guidelines, but not being familiar with 
>>> the IETF terminology I'm no longer even sure whether I'm submitting 
>>> an RFC or an Internet draft -- I thought I was submitting an RFC but 
>>> maybe I'm
>> wrong?
>>> So
>>> I really appreciate any help that you can provide me.
>>>
>>> I have attached the draft, and look forwards to receiving your reply.
>>>
>>> Best wishes
>>>
>>> Jo Goodwin
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: internet-drafts at ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts at ietf.org]
>>> Sent: 2006-01-25 21:26
>>> To: goodwin at iso.org
>>> Subject: RE: Application for a formal NID
>>>
>>> Hello Jo,
>>>
>>> I would suggest you to submit your draft. As we receive it, we will 
>>> check it for correctness. If everthing is okey, we post it --- if 
>>> not, we will send you a message telling what and where you should 
>>> add. I think this is the better solution for the question.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Dinara Suleymanova
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks for the info. As you can see I have no experience in the 
>>>> submission of such documents, but am willing to learn.
>>>>
>>>> I have had a quick look at the document you gave a link to below 
>>>> and have noticed that at least a certain number of the things 
>>>> mentioned appear to be related to boilerplate texts. I searched the 
>>>> guidelines to see whether there was a mention of a template but 
>>>> could find no mention. Would it be possible to provide me with a 
>>>> link to a template or alternatively to provide me with an example 
>>>> of what you would consider to be a good draft?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>
>>>> Jo Goodwin
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: internet-drafts at ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts at ietf.org]
>>>> Sent: 2006-01-24 19:49
>>>> To: goodwin at iso.org
>>>> Cc: 'Leslie Daigle'; urn-nid at apps.ietf.org; clivio at iso.org; 'Apel 
>>>> Holger'; 'Rinta-Filppula Pasi'; mckinley at iso.org
>>>> Subject: RE: Application for a formal NID
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Please find here the link which weill help you to properly compose 
>>>> a draft.
>>>> As soon as you have all necessary statements in the drafts, etc, 
>>>> please resubmit.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.html
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The revised version is now ready and is attached. Thank you for 
>>>>> your indulgence.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please do not hesitate to let me know if there's anything else 
>>>>> that is required on my/our part.
>>>>>
>>>>> With best wishes
>>>>>
>>>>> Joanna Goodwin
>>>>> Manager, Production Services
>>>>> Standards Department
>>>>> International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Leslie Daigle [mailto:leslie at thinkingcat.com]
>>>>> Sent: 2006-01-19 18:42
>>>>> To: goodwin at iso.org
>>>>> Cc: urn-nid at apps.ietf.org; clivio at iso.org; 'Apel Holger'; 
>>>>> 'Rinta-Filppula Pasi'; mckinley at iso.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: Application for a formal NID
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Howdy,
>>>>>
>>>>> I look forward to the revised version.
>>>>>
>>>>> RFC3406 does actually stipulate the requirement:
>>>>>
>>>>> It's implicit here:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Thus, the Formal NID application is made via publication of an 
>>>>>> RFC
>>>>>>    through standard IETF processes.
>>>>>
>>>>> (standard IETF processes begin with I-D publication) and spelled 
>>>>> out in the detailed appendix:
>>>>>
>>>>>>      2. Send the Internet-Draft to the I-D editor, and send a 
>>>>>> copy to
>>>>>>          urn-nid at apps.ietf.org for technical review.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If/when RFC3406 gets revised, I can see making that much more 
>>>>> explicit upfront, particularly for people who aren't as 
>>>>> immediately involved in the IETF work as some.
>>>>>
>>>>> Leslie.
>>>>>
>>>>> Goodwin wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks for your mail. I had attached the draft to the e-mail that 
>>>>>> I sent.
>>>>>> Sorry about not putting it in the IETF Internet-Draft repository
>>>>>> -- can't see that RFC 3406 mentions that it is necessary to do this.
>>>>>> Is this rule given in another document that I should have read?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since submitting this draft in December, I have received a 
>>>>>> request from one of our TCs to alter the draft slightly.
>>>>>> Accordingly I will submit a slightly revised draft next week.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience caused.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With best wishes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Joanna Goodwin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Leslie Daigle [mailto:leslie at thinkingcat.com]
>>>>>> Sent: 2006-01-10 19:08
>>>>>> To: goodwin at iso.org
>>>>>> Cc: urn-nid at apps.ietf.org; clivio at iso.org; 'Apel Holger'; 
>>>>>> 'Rinta-Filppula Pasi'; mckinley at iso.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: Application for a formal NID
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As noted by the list moderator, a number of messages were held up 
>>>>>> in the moderation queue until January 6, 2006 -- so we did not 
>>>>>> see your message until then.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For this request -- I am unable to find the document in the IETF 
>>>>>> Internet-Draft repository.  Could you please provide the exact 
>>>>>> pointer, or make sure to submit the document there if you have 
>>>>>> not already
>>>>> done so[*].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Leslie.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [*] See http://www.ietf.org/ID.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Goodwin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Dear IETF org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Please find attached an application for a formal NID from the 
>>>>>>>International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Should you 
>>>>>>>require any further information, please do not hesitate to 
>>>>>>>contact us.
>>>>>>>In the meantime please accept our best wishes for the festive 
>>>>>>>season.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Best regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Joanna Goodwin
>>>>>>>Manager, Production Services
>>>>>>>Standards Department
>>>>>>>International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Prev by Date: Request for an informal NID (dup)
Next by Date: URN Namespace for GEANT - Internet - Draft
Previous by thread: RE: Application for a formal NID
Next by thread: IVIS namespace allocation request
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread