Re: Submission draft-goodwin-iso-urn-00.txt -- application for a formal NID

[Leslie Daigle <leslie at thinkingcat.com>]

Yep, looks good to me, too -- but I'm still not seeing it
in the draft repository.  Am I missing something, or are
there still problems with the submission?

Thanks,
Leslie.

Goodwin wrote:
> What good news. Thank you. Thanks also for the compliment.
>
> Joanna Goodwin 
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Mealling [mailto:michael at neonym.net] 
> Sent: 2006-03-30 17:43
> To: goodwin at iso.org
> Cc: urn-nid at apps.ietf.org; 'SC'; 'Holger Apel'; rinta-filppula at iso.org;
> mckinley at iso.org
> Subject: Re: Submission draft-goodwin-iso-urn-00.txt -- application for a
> formal NID
>
> Goodwin wrote:
> > Please find attached a reformatted version for application for a formal
> NID.
> > As before, if there is anything else that needs to be done to assure 
> > submission could you please let us know as soon as possible. If there 
> > are any further problems, would it possible to list all of them in one 
> > go -- I think it would be quicker for us both.
>
> I have to say this is one of the most thorough, well written and well
> justified NID applications I've seen in a while. And that includes the ones
> I wrote. Good job!
>
> For the record, I think the document is complete and correct. I have no
> comments or concerns.
>
> -MM