[urn] WG progress
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 03 October 2011 17:37 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FD521F8C1C for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.616
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.616 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.017, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0AllBozisP7q for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB7621F8C17 for <urn@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-178.cisco.com (unknown [64.101.72.178]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 422E9E84C9 for <urn@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 11:44:43 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4E89F38F.6060605@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 11:40:31 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [urn] WG progress
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about possible revisions to the definition of Uniform Resource Names <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:37:30 -0000
<hat type='AD'/> The following documents are currently expired (and indeed were last updated in 2010): * draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn * draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc3187bis-isbn-urn * draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc3188bis-nbn-urn * draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc3406bis-urn-ns-reg The URNBIS WG had milestones to issue Working Group Last Calls on those documents in February of 2011 and deliver them to the IESG in April. The WG is now seriously behind schedule. Although there has been a bit of discussion on the mailing list, the results of those discussions have not been incorporated into updated Internet-Drafts. Furthermore, the WG did not meet at IETF 81 and does not plan to meet at IETF 82. If the WG does not make visible progress before IETF 82 (which I would measure by, at least, updated versions of the chartered I-Ds), as the responsible AD I will need to consider taking more drastic measures to generate a successful outcome, or consider closing the WG. Document authors, please note that the final submission cut-off before IETF 82 is October 31, so you have 4 weeks to make some progress... Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
- [urn] WG progress Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [urn] WG progress Peter Saint-Andre