IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-troan-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-00

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Mon, 07 February 2011 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ichiroumakino@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B22C3A6E15 for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 07:17:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PssqsqETDboX for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 07:17:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFCD63A6E13 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 07:17:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so2553138eyd.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 07:17:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:from:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:references:to:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer; bh=TFsGHWv2Tw4Q7lecX2qO7PMHsajH6ifvyNuzVEYHxkw=; b=EYZeKfKEY/Kox3IuISW1bEzYAWhzvztcTk7iEbjrvf5cPzNsVBbarvY/7SXrd0WtZx NurxX8A+cXJCtroxERE2Q7BfELaF7VLPCzp2bizE2ELCeDZpc24QXE2feaGbVwbAYbS5 BM+OXNluQ0SMg6SQ8zLaA+gQEAJKNcGDfAxZU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date :references:to:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=rqMLC1zkM6hKWfHOkH9Hm0oj6iuPVcYKxALiimQpWGweY6FHn33UrT3b+mWYItWDOo B1G1j8Em7zmOO+rRu045cuK56j9R6u2qCwC6Ivtz1oWFCwgsaCiqLw25tK1c7ezFiRo4 B675/qklrtKkp8m1J0kxvg3PomZPxpiweWApo=
Received: by 10.14.17.193 with SMTP id j41mr5364454eej.38.1297091871354; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 07:17:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-10-55-82-142.cisco.com (64-103-25-233.cisco.com [64.103.25.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q52sm3189434eei.21.2011.02.07.07.17.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 07 Feb 2011 07:17:50 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Ole Troan <ichiroumakino@gmail.com>
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 16:17:48 +0100
References: <20110207151430.44A393A6DD8@core3.amsl.com>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <F6CE2721-F0D1-46FA-8568-0A8D062B9AED@employees.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Subject: [v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-troan-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-00
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:17:48 -0000

I just posted the following draft suggesting that we move the 6to4 documents to historic.

cheers,
Ole


Begin forwarded message:

> From: IETF I-D Submission Tool <idsubmission@ietf.org>
> Date: February 7, 2011 16:14:30 GMT+01:00
> To: ot@cisco.com
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-troan-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-00 
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-troan-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Ole Troan and posted to the IETF repository.
> 
> Filename:	 draft-troan-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
> Revision:	 00
> Title:		 Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status
> Creation_date:	 2011-02-07
> WG ID:		 Independent Submission
> Number_of_pages: 11
> 
> Abstract:
> Experience with the "Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds
> (6to4)" IPv6 transitioning mechanism has shown that the mechanism is
> unsuitable for widespread deployment and use in the Internet.  This
> document requests that RFC3056 [RFC3056] is moved to historic status.
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat.
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email