IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 06 August 2012 14:29 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3FF21F85C9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 07:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.301, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DPcwg5FfSHsA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 07:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EF421F858F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 07:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 81256B1E003; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 07:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
To: gunter@cisco.com, cpopovic@cisco.com, tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk, Olaf.Bonness@t-systems.com, HahnC@t-systems.com, rbonica@juniper.net, bclaise@cisco.com, fred.baker@cisco.com, joelja@bogus.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20120806142829.81256B1E003@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 07:28:29 -0700
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 07:38:05 -0700
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, livio.zanol.puppim@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 14:29:26 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5375,
"IPv6 Unicast Address Assignment Considerations".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5375&eid=3309

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Lívio Zanol Pereira de Souza Puppim <livio.zanol.puppim@gmail.com>

Section: B.2.2

Original Text
-------------
 B.2.2. /127 Addresses

   The usage of the /127 addresses, the equivalent of IPv4's RFC 3021
   [RFC3021], is not valid and should be strongly discouraged as
   documented in RFC 3627 [RFC3627].

Corrected Text
--------------
 B.2.2. /127 Addresses

   The usage of the /127 addresses, the equivalent of IPv4's RFC 3021
   [RFC3021], is valid as stated in RFC 6164 [RFC 6164].

Notes
-----
Maybe just remove the section B.2.2?

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5375 (draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon-10)
--------------------------------------
Title               : IPv6 Unicast Address Assignment Considerations
Publication Date    : December 2008
Author(s)           : G. Van de Velde, C. Popoviciu, T. Chown, O. Bonness, C. Hahn
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : IPv6 Operations
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email