[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [VCARDDAV] draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav: should support for vCard 4.0 be recommended?

To: vcarddav at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav: should support for vCard 4.0 be recommended?
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault at viagenie.ca>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:38:29 -0400
Delivered-to: vcarddav at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <4A9D8490.90807 at isode.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Viagénie
References: <4A888C37.50400 at isode.com> <46F6B54FB97EDFC2555E8CF3 at caldav.corp.apple.com> <4A9D8490.90807 at isode.com>
User-agent: KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11.x86_64; KDE/4.2.4; x86_64; ; )

On Tuesday 01 September 2009 16:31:12 Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> I would really like to hear clear consensus from the WG that either this
> should stay as is, or that [I-D.ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev] should be a SHOULD.

As an implementer of CardDAV and author of vCard 4, I can say that adding 
support for vCard 4 to an implementation of CardDAV supporting vCard 3 is 
easy. The syntax is near enough that changes are minimal.

+1 for SHOULD

Simon
-- 
DNS64 open-source   --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server    --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0           --> http://www.vcarddav.org

References:
- [VCARDDAV] AD review of draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav-07.txt
  - From: Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [VCARDDAV] AD review of draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav-07.txt
  - From: Cyrus Daboo
- [VCARDDAV] draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav: should support for vCard 4.0 be recommended?
  - From: Alexey Melnikov

Prev by Date: [VCARDDAV] draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav: should support for vCard 4.0 be recommended?
Next by Date: Re: [VCARDDAV] draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav: should support for vCard 4.0 be recommended?
Previous by thread: [VCARDDAV] draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav: should support for vCard 4.0 be recommended?
Next by thread: Re: [VCARDDAV] draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav: should support for vCard 4.0 be recommended?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread