Re: [VCARDDAV] draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav: should support for vCard 4.0 be recommended?

[Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 9/9/09 5:32 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>> ...
>>> I would really like to hear clear consensus from the WG that either
>>> this should stay as is, or that [I-D.ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev] should
>>> be a SHOULD.
>>
>> While I haven't heard strong support for my proposal to say that
>> support for vCard 4.0 is a SHOULD, I haven't heard anybody saying
>> otherwise.
> 
> I support that requirement, in case that matters :-).

Same here. Let's join the modern world. ;-)

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkqpDiAACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzjPgCg7LRAa0EiBrzTpnccuZvv/9Di
SNQAoOfyoymen5jurkFDAzspGBgs9ucu
=eY3t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----