[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [VCARDDAV] vcardrev nits



On Sep 16, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
...
I disagree.
If for some reason the I-D refers to information in the (to be) obsoleted information, then yes. But this is no different than any other informational reference. However, if the I-D simply has:
Obsoletes: RFC X
and text:
   This document obsoletes RFC X.
There is no need to have an informative reference and, in my opinion, having a informative reference for just such is distracting and ought to be avoided.
...

You are right if there's nothing else that needs to be said.

Frequently however, a revision of spec actually makes changes, in which case I would expect a "changes since rfc xxxx" section, which optimally should be precise in what changed (potentially including references to specific sections in the original spec).

I would avoid adding a reference even in this case. But I don't care strongly about it. I'm fine with leaving the decision to the document's editor.

-- Kurt