Re: [VCARDDAV] vcardrev nits

[Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 9/16/09 3:57 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
>> ...
>> I disagree.
>>
>> If for some reason the I-D refers to information in the (to be)
>> obsoleted information, then yes.  But this is no different than any
>> other informational reference.   However, if the I-D simply has:
>>
>> Obsoletes: RFC X
>>
>> and text:
>>     This document obsoletes RFC X.
>>
>> There is no need to have an informative reference and, in my opinion,
>> having a informative reference for just such is distracting and ought
>> to be avoided.
>> ...
> 
> You are right if there's nothing else that needs to be said.

My point was that the IMPP field is not new, however it was previously
defined in RFC 4770 rather than in RFC 2426. If someone comes to
vcardrev expecting to find all and only an update to RFC 2426, they
might be surprised by the inclusion of IMPP.

But it's not a major issue for me either way.

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkqw8C0ACgkQNL8k5A2w/vyU/wCfamUpEg7xNdqakO5G3GHFZRo8
dOwAn0zsNlnzV9cELaahwWH39v10EUVd
=nbyO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----