Re: [VCARDDAV] SIP support in vCard 4.0
Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Wed, 08 September 2010 16:35 UTC
Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D6D3A6807 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 09:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.034, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F8gH0t961mrW for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 09:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEFB3A67A6 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 09:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ringo.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:31c4:25fe:2da7:4273]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1642E21BBB for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 12:36:19 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4C87BB82.5030503@viagenie.ca>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:36:18 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vcarddav@ietf.org
References: <AANLkTi=HHZ_rfn_-UPD8bLRWXxBHzXibtweuCPJzNbk3@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=HHZ_rfn_-UPD8bLRWXxBHzXibtweuCPJzNbk3@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] SIP support in vCard 4.0
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:35:55 -0000
On 2010-09-08 12:22, Daisuke Miyakawa wrote: > In vCard 4.0, I'm not sure which field should be used to support it: > TEL, or IMPP. > I don't know well about SIP, but it can be interpreted as both, as SIP > seems often used for voice/video calls and TEL allows schema other than > "tel:" (See 6.4.1.) Yes, I think both are fine. If you want to be contacted with instant messaging over SIP, use IMPP. If you want to be contacted with voice/video over SIP, use TEL. And if both are fine, then use both. Is there a reason why we would need to pick one? I don't want vCard properties to be associated with particular URI schemes, otherwise properties become irrelevant and we can just put everything into the URL property. The same argument could be valid for XMPP since it also supports voice and video. Simon -- NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca vCard 4.0 --> http://www.vcarddav.org
- [VCARDDAV] SIP support in vCard 4.0 Daisuke Miyakawa
- Re: [VCARDDAV] SIP support in vCard 4.0 Simon Perreault
- Re: [VCARDDAV] SIP support in vCard 4.0 Daisuke Miyakawa
- Re: [VCARDDAV] SIP support in vCard 4.0 Simon Perreault
- Re: [VCARDDAV] SIP support in vCard 4.0 Daisuke Miyakawa