[Webpush] webpush for http2 -02
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Sat, 13 December 2014 00:01 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3621A1AB9 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:01:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bLmSA7nHl2lJ for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:01:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x230.google.com (mail-ob0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F29CA1A1A9F for <webpush@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:01:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id vb8so10712245obc.7 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:01:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=p65GnonkodZTeAlaL9HVPXRWmbejd8K5EzDwAyMHL7A=; b=XbEVWvZJkMzUxAPK1K0FPyvDBfv3M1PXTD2uWVxDMKyo+6YuG1PPYbwFK4Iyn6Yecl A8UBeMZOzoYcHIqD5l/jj1HqJT25174C2cfYO6SVZUXi6d8w04y1eIclJ60EF2Dh7uEr 1atWt4OmGrJgMwCw+ToEu7wypqg9ZX5LsLpjTmS+rE6bOGgN1ab34EHlj2MDIASYOewY HoSsZUYmmWP6mmf4+p+4xo2ldlGyBURQ+7PYchjN8ze6txAbvdmE9ITMpZgZM3sv5irA BSMVBCQTMxq2AB+2IA/mNSRcVIkz/DZ4qKdjLLj+gD/U5MLry7UR0wwxbnuFfskMAG7c pa9Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.51.8 with SMTP id z8mr11205111oiz.77.1418428889186; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:01:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.107.19 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:01:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:01:29 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUxA0uOCF3TqUkfv2hjJnKfyKyR+EVai8Ag060p6KBgug@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/AO_qTvcM6o5ZuiD4PGQpotop44A
Subject: [Webpush] webpush for http2 -02
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 00:01:32 -0000
I've revised the protocol proposal for web push. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomson-webpush-http2/ A more readable HTML version is here, though this will be updated as I make changes: https://martinthomson.github.io/drafts/draft-thomson-webpush-http2.html This includes some fairly significant changes to incorporate the feedback I've received from various corners. I haven't prepared a change log, but I believe that this covers at least the high points of what was discussed at the meeting: - names of everything have changed - I've added examples and expanded the explanatory text throughout - removed use of 202 due to a privacy concern (thanks to Robert Sparks for sharing his experience with this) - significantly expanded the operational considerations regarding load distribution and message retention - minimum message size of 4k added
- [Webpush] webpush for http2 -02 Martin Thomson
- Re: [Webpush] webpush for http2 -02 Benjamin Bangert
- Re: [Webpush] webpush for http2 -02 Benjamin Bangert