[weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Another BoF in Paris?)
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Wed, 08 February 2012 22:15 UTC
Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9608C21F85BE for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 14:15:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.607
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.607 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.008, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6gDVeZ-zt2hk for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 14:15:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8982221F85C2 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 14:15:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (69-196-144-227.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EB271ECB41D for <weirds@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 22:15:46 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:15:44 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: weirds@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20120208221544.GP11475@mail.yitter.info>
References: <20120208192144.GJ11475@mail.yitter.info> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C9A7DC80@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <4F32D0CD.5080203@gmail.com> <40043833-FCED-4D77-9D8C-A9F2041AA5BD@hxr.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <40043833-FCED-4D77-9D8C-A9F2041AA5BD@hxr.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Another BoF in Paris?)
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:15:48 -0000
Dear colleagues, With so many people telling me I was being an Eeyore (this is not, _mirabile dictu_, the first time I have heard that), I thought I'd better try again with some charter text. I therefore offer the attached text as a proposed charter for WEIRDS. I have incorporated what I understand to be the thrust of various positions people have taken. I believe I incorporated actual proposed text when it was offered, except in the case where the prior consensus rejected that approach (here, I'm thinking particularly of the suggestions to make name registries and number registries both part of the initial work list; this was strongly rejected in Taipei, and we don't have additional drafts or additional experiments to point to that would undercut that consensus). I also included some changes sent to me off-list, including some by Pete Resnick. Thanks to all those who sent suggestions. If nobody has any objections, I'd like to offer this to the IESG as evidence that we have a group of people willing to work on a well-scoped problem. It still isn't clear to me whether I ought to request a BoF slot or whether we should just press ahead on the basis of what looks like a group of people already having agreed. Are there things we think would benefit from a face to face meeting? Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
- [weirds] Another BoF in Paris? Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [weirds] Another BoF in Paris? Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [weirds] Another BoF in Paris? Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo
- Re: [weirds] Another BoF in Paris? Andy Newton
- [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Another … Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… Michael Young
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [weirds] Another BoF in Paris? Dave Piscitello
- Re: [weirds] Another BoF in Paris? SM
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… Jim Galvin
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Peter Koch
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… John Levine
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… Dave Piscitello
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… John Levine
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… Tran, Trung
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… Don Blumenthal
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… Don Blumenthal
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… John Levine
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… John R. Levine
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… SM
- [weirds] New new proposed charter text Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Andy Newton
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text SM
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Andy Newton
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Smith, Bill
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text John Levine
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text John Levine
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Smith, Bill
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Gavin Brown
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Peter Koch
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Dave Piscitello
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text SM
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text John Levine
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Michael Young
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Dave Piscitello
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text SM
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Dave Piscitello
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text SM
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Arturo Servin
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text John Levine
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text John Levine
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Dave Piscitello
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Arturo Servin
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Andy Newton
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Dave Piscitello
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Andy Newton
- Re: [weirds] the charter is done John Levine
- Re: [weirds] the charter is done Dave Piscitello
- Re: [weirds] the charter is done Smith, Bill
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Dave Piscitello
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Dave Piscitello
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Peter Koch
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Jim Galvin
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Byron Ellacott
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Andy Newton
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… Avri Doria
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… John Levine
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… Avri Doria
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… Andy Newton
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo
- [weirds] Why are we sure one protocol is better (… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… Michael Young
- Re: [weirds] Why are we sure one protocol is bett… Michael Young
- [weirds] Who's committing to what? Dave Piscitello
- [weirds] Separate data model, was New new propose… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [weirds] Who's committing to what? Michael Young
- Re: [weirds] Separate data model, was New new pro… Andy Newton
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… John Levine
- Re: [weirds] Separate data model, was New new pro… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [weirds] Who's committing to what? Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [weirds] Separate data model, was New new pro… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [weirds] Why are we sure one protocol is bett… Francisco Arias
- Re: [weirds] Why are we sure one protocol is bett… Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo
- Re: [weirds] Why are we sure one protocol is bett… Francisco Obispo
- Re: [weirds] Why are we sure one protocol is bett… Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo
- Re: [weirds] Why are we sure one protocol is bett… Francisco Obispo
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Pete Resnick
- Re: [weirds] Separate data model, was New new pro… Arturo Servin
- Re: [weirds] Why are we sure one protocol is bett… David Conrad
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Smith, Bill
- Re: [weirds] Why are we sure one protocol is bett… David Conrad
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Arturo Servin
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Francisco Arias
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Smith, Bill
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Dave Piscitello
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Smith, Bill
- Re: [weirds] Why are we sure one protocol is bett… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [weirds] Why are we sure one protocol is bett… David Conrad
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Pete Resnick
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Pete Resnick
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Warren Kumari
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text SM
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Francisco Arias
- Re: [weirds] Why are we sure one protocol is bett… Warren Kumari
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Pete Resnick
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Smith, Bill
- Re: [weirds] Why are we sure one protocol is bett… Francisco Obispo
- Re: [weirds] Different protocols, was New new John Levine
- Re: [weirds] New proposed charter text (was: Anot… SM
- Re: [weirds] New new proposed charter text Francisco Arias
- Re: [weirds] Why are we sure one protocol is bett… Peter Koch