[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New ID-Checklist to replace ID-nits (fwd)

To: Pekka Savola <pekkas at netcore.fi>
Subject: Re: New ID-Checklist to replace ID-nits (fwd)
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb at research.att.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 15:55:52 -0400
Cc: wgchairs at ietf.org, iesg at ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 25 May 2004 22:21:00 +0300." <Pine.LNX.4.44.0405252220060.25663-100000@netcore.fi>
List-help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: wgchairs-bounces at ietf.org

In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0405252220060.25663-100000 at netcore.fi>, Pekka Savola 
writes:
>I don't think I've seen any answer from the Powers that Be on whether 
>RFC2026 is still a "good enough" boilerplate esp. for old work.
>
>Please comment on that.

Speaking for myself only, and not as either an AD nor as the IPR wg 
chair, there is absolutely no need for a crash effort to update old 
I-Ds to have the new boilerplate.  Conversely, documents being 
submitted to the IESG should have the new boilerplate.

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New ID-Checklist to replace ID-nits (fwd)
  - From: Jonne Soininen
- Re: New ID-Checklist to replace ID-nits (fwd)
  - From: Scott Bradner

References:
- Re: New ID-Checklist to replace ID-nits (fwd)
  - From: Pekka Savola

Prev by Date: Re: New ID-Checklist to replace ID-nits (fwd)
Next by Date: RE: Reminder: please maintain mailing list archive at ietf.org
Previous by thread: Re: New ID-Checklist to replace ID-nits (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: New ID-Checklist to replace ID-nits (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread