[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New ID-Checklist to replace ID-nits (fwd)

To: iesg at ietf.org, pekkas at netcore.fi
Subject: Re: New ID-Checklist to replace ID-nits (fwd)
From: sob at harvard.edu (Scott Bradner)
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 16:54:49 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: wgchairs at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0405252220060.25663-100000@netcore.fi>
List-help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: wgchairs-bounces at ietf.org

> I don't think I've seen any answer from the Powers that Be on whether 
> RFC2026 is still a "good enough" boilerplate esp. for old work.

I'd say "no" since rfc 3667 and 3668 have been approved and published

Scott

References:
- Re: New ID-Checklist to replace ID-nits (fwd)
  - From: Pekka Savola

Prev by Date: RE: Reminder: please maintain mailing list archive at ietf.org
Next by Date: Re: New ID-Checklist to replace ID-nits (fwd)
Previous by thread: Re: New ID-Checklist to replace ID-nits (fwd)
Next by thread: RE: New ID-Checklist to replace ID-nits (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread