Copyright statements in drafts

[Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund at ericsson.com>]

Hi,

With all the work to get authors to start using the new draft 
boilerplate one question has been raised by one of my WG document 
editors which I couldn't answer.

The RFCs has a copyright statement directly after the status of this 
memo section, in addition to the complete statement in the back. Like in 
the recent published RFC 3783:

Network Working Group                                     M. Chadalapaka
Request for Comments: 3783                                    R. Elliott
Category: Informational                              Hewlett-Packard Co.
                                                                May 2004


               Small Computer Systems Interface (SCSI)
               Command Ordering Considerations with iSCSI

Status of this Memo

   This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
   not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
   memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).  All Rights Reserved.

Abstract
...


What about these first page copyright notice. Which of the following 
rules is the correct one for a internet draft?
- MUST have the statement
- MUST NOT have the statement
- MAY have the statement

A clarification on this would be beneficial. And it is probably a good 
thing to add this to the ID guidelines.

Thanks

Magnus Westerlund

Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVA/A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone +46 8 4048287
Torshamsgatan 23           | Fax   +46 8 7575550
S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund at ericsson.com