[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More lost drafts?

To: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: More lost drafts?
From: Thomas Narten <narten at us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 12:58:22 -0400
Cc: wgchairs at ietf.org
In-reply-to: Message from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org of "Fri, 28 May 2004 07:30:01 PDT." <p0610050abcdcfcee0a5d@[10.20.30.249]>
List-help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: wgchairs-bounces at ietf.org

> It is even more annoying when things like IETF last calls on WG 
> documents don't get sent to the WG mailing list (this happened 
> recently for the L3VPN WG).

This is a bug that crept in sometime in January (I did some poking
around after being notified about the l3vpn example you cite). In the
past, WGs were being copied, as of course, they should be.

A bug report was filed earlier this week.

Thomas

References:
- Re: More lost drafts?
  - From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC

Prev by Date: RE: Copyright statements in drafts
Next by Date: resolving varous CCing things
Previous by thread: Re: More lost drafts?
Next by thread: RE: More lost drafts?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread