[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Copyright statements in drafts

To: paul.hoffman at vpnc.org, sob at harvard.edu, wgchairs at ietf.org
Subject: RE: Copyright statements in drafts
From: sob at harvard.edu (Scott Bradner)
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 16:59:03 -0400 (EDT)
In-reply-to: <p06110477bce4ee3fcf57@[10.20.30.249]>
List-help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: wgchairs-bounces at ietf.org

> As an archair lawyer, I would say that this makes absolutely no sense 
> at all. Copyright is atomic unless stated otherwise. If you say 
> "Copyright ISOC", you have no "other copyright rights".

teh copyright in question is on the ID itself

> Before we start telling people that they will retain some rights even 
> if they assign the copyright to ISOC, we need to get a legal opinion 
> from the IETF lawyers.


we did - that is what is in RFC 3667

Scott

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Copyright statements in drafts
  - From: carl

References:
- RE: Copyright statements in drafts
  - From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC

Prev by Date: RE: Copyright statements in drafts
Next by Date: Re: Copyright statements in drafts
Previous by thread: RE: Copyright statements in drafts
Next by thread: RE: Copyright statements in drafts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread