Re: Revised idea for early cross-area review

[Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>]

Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> In message <436A1F69.80105 at zurich.ibm.com>, Brian E Carpenter writes:
>
>
> > - the WG chair(s) will also specifically solicit reviews from one or two
> >  members of the early-reviews list, at their discretion. They will specify
> >  particular areas of concern if appropriate. (It's worth noting the obvious:
> >  the absence of early reviews doesn't imply that there are no cross-area
> >  issues.)
>
>
> This provision concerns me a great deal -- there's no load-leveling or 
> load-limiting.  When I'm asked to review documents as part of my role 
> in the security directorate, I know that the ADs are spreading the load.
> Here, any individual WG chair is unaware of what his or her colleagues 
> are doing.

Right. For Gen-ART, we have a human dispatcher who performs
loose load balancing. Do you think we will need a human (or robotic)
dispatcher for this?

   Brian