Not a problem.I've escalated this up to Jim Galvin - who helped set the rules and tone for spam processing. He is discussing this with Russ and others now.
It's an easy thing to disable the checks - I'm just not comfortable doing that arbitrarily, when finding a way to bring the other host into more standard conformity might be an option. So I've sent this back to the IETF to let them determine how they want to proceed.
Glen Barry Leiba wrote:
Also, I've cc'ed the wgchairs list on this response - because you cc'ed them on your ticket filing - but I cannot leave the list as a permanent ticket cc because of the potential for floding. So when you file a ticket, I'd recommend not cc'ing the whole world - or at least not mailing lists - since RT can be a bit, umm, "difficult" about things like that.Actually, you didn't cc wgchairs. I've fixed that and replaced the ietf-actionmail with your direct address to avoid excessive ticket creation.And for the record, Glen, since I inferred from one of your messages that you'd prefer to sort this out offline and post the result -- and I understand that: I, for one, would like to see the discussion continue here on the list. Seeing the intermediate considerations and discussion is both interesting and useful.Barry -- Barry Leiba, DKIM working group chair (leiba at watson.ibm.com)