[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Mail filtering Closure
- To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik at levkowetz.com>, Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com>, Ray Pelletier <rpelletier at isoc.org>, Working Group Chairs <wgchairs at ietf.org>, Karen Moreland <kmoreland at amsl.com>, Alexa Morris <amorris at amsl.com>, Matt Larson <mlarson at amsl.com>, jari.arkko at piuha.net, ekr at networkresonance.com, danny at tcb.net, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik at levkowetz.com>, Bill Fenner <fenner at fenron.com>, joelja at bogus.com, James M Galvin <galvin at elistx.com>, Lisa Winkler <lwinkler at amsl.com>, testlist at mail.ietf.org
- Subject: Mail filtering Closure
- From: Glen <glen at amsl.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:50:58 -0700
- Delivered-to: ietfarch-wgchairs-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
- Delivered-to: wgchairs at core3.amsl.com
- In-reply-to: <48289AEB.6000706@levkowetz.com>
- List-archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/wgchairs>
- List-help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
- List-post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <4828704D.5010809@amsl.com> <48289AEB.6000706@levkowetz.com>
- Sender: wgchairs-bounces at ietf.org
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
All -
Okay, having read all the email, and getting follow-up fom Jim and Russ,
I think it's become clear that we are willing to face the burden of a
potential increase in spam (lower case! ;-) ) to release these two other
checks.
As such, I have now removed those checks, and we should be good to go.
A few closing points -
TOM PETCH - THANK YOU for taking the time to explain the consensus
process to me, and your views on its operability. I found that message
to be extremely valuable, and I greatly appreciate it.
DANNY - Thanks for catching the IPV6 thing! I'll get that blocked later
today. (I don't think that's been widely-used yet, and I hadn't even
considered it, but you are quite right, and I very much appreciate you
pointing that out.)
ERIC - Thanks for being the pro-forma guinea pig here, and taking the
time to explain your position so clearly.
As for the list moderation messages, those occurred because we were all
group-copying everyone on this thread, and mailman apparently doesn't
like messages with "too many recipients." I've released the last of the
held messages (including my own, and this one, momentarily!) and that
should do it.
Finally, I saw mention of interest in creating a web page that could
provide bypass mechanisms to contact the IETF. I'm referring that back
to Jim Galvin to discuss with your ED, Alexa Morris.
As a point of interest, we do have the full ability to bypass individual
senders, hosts, clients, recipients, etc., from being subject to these
or any tests. For example, if it was decided that you wanted one or
more of these checks put in place, but you wanted all mail "TO"
iab at iab.org (or whatever) to be exempted from the checks, that is easily
easily done. Just say the word.
For now, the other two problematic checks have been removed, and,
barring further direction, I'll "close this one out" on that note!
As always, feel free to contact me at any time for any reason.
Warm regards,
Glen Barney
Server Servant
AMS