[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Do drafts need to pass IDnits to be posted?



Have I missed a change in rules requiring that all drafts need to pass IDnits (as opposed to just have a correct boilerplate)?

--- Begin Message ---
Hi All,

Unfortunately this draft has an error of being over 15 pages long and not
having a table of contents.  Please add a table of contents and I will be
happy to post this draft.

Thank you,

IETF Secretariat






On Sat, June 21, 2008 9:51 am, IETF I-D Submission Tool wrote:
> Manual Posting Requested for following Internet-Draft:
>
> I-D Submission Tool URL:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/idst/status.cgi?submission_id=7434
>
>
> Filename:	   draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-notify
> Version:	   06
> Staging URL:
> http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/staging/draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-notify-06.txt
> Title:		   The IMAP NOTIFY Extension
> Creation_date:	   2008-06-21
> WG ID:		   lemonade
> Number_of_pages: 22
> Abstract:
> This document defines an IMAP extension which allows a client to
>  request specific kinds of unsolicited notifications for specified
>  mailboxes, such as messages being added to or deleted from
>  mailboxes.
>
>  [[Add Updates: RFC-CONTEXT to the headers]]
>
> Submitter: Alexey Melnikov (Alexey.Melnikov at isode.com)
>
> Author(s):
> Curtis King, Curtis.King at isode.com
> Alexey Melnikov, Alexey.Melnikov at isode.com
> Arnt Gulbrandsen, arnt at oryx.com
>
>
> Comment:
> IDnits shouldn't care about page length, this issue is not essential for
> drafts and can easily be fixed by the RFC editor.
>
>
>



--- End Message ---