Re: Do drafts need to pass IDnits to be posted?

[Alexa Morris <amorris at amsl.com>]

Alexey,

First, I'm sorry we (AMS) returned your draft to you for an illegitimate
reason. It is clear that we need to  clarify our own internal posting
procedures a bit.  One thing we will do in the next couple of weeks is put
together a reference document that details what is required, and what is
merely desired, for an ID submission. I'll circulate this with the
appropriate folks and verify that our understanding is correct, so that we
can be sure that everyone is on the same page moving forward.

Has your draft been posted yet? If not, please let me know the filename and
I will see that it is posted today.

Regards,
Alexa

-----------
Alexa Morris / Executive Director / IETF
48377 Fremont Blvd., Suite 117, Fremont, CA  94538
Phone: +1.510.492.4089 / Fax: +1.510.492.4001
Email: amorris at amsl.com

Managed by Association Management Solutions (AMS)
Forum Management, Meeting and Event Planning
www.amsl.com <http://www.amsl.com/>


On 6/26/08 8:03 AM, "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov at isode.com> wrote:

> Hi Mary,
> 
> Mary Barnes wrote:
> 
>> Finally, out of curiousity, why are folks still finding the need to
>> submit manually?  Are there issues with the tool that need to be
>> addressed? Or, is there anything unusual about your document. I ask
>> because we still have authors submitting manually, as well, within our
>> WG, so I would like to understand the motivations for NOT using the
>> online tool (which I think is fabulous).
>>  
>> 
> I have a document in nroff format. It was rejected by the web submission
> tool due to lack of TOC, which is annoying, but Okeyish.
> This lead to manual submission, which was rejected due to lack of TOC...
>